Mẹo nhỏ: Để tìm kiếm chính xác các bài viết có nội dung hữu ích dành cho độc giả, hãy search trên Google với cú pháp: "Từ khóa" + "thaoyenblog". (Ví dụ: thiệp tân linh mục thaoyenblog). Tìm kiếm ngay
133 lượt xem

Recycling solar panels: doing thes numbers live – Y2KR

Recycling solar panels: doing thes numbers live.

NREL researchers said a profitable and sustainable solar panel recycling industry could establish itself by 2032. when oncoming here’s how thes numbers live.

From pv magazine USA

if this thes solar industry wants to claim it has green cred, then solar panels must be managed in a sustainable manner at thes end of time of their usable lives.

Scientists at thes U.S. department of Energy’s National Renewable Laboratory (NREL) published research this describes how to motivate thes market first of all to reuse solar panels, and then recycle them by guiding national industrial policy to shape a financially viable end-of-daily life solar panel industry.

thes research was published in nature Energy and offers a very real number and only for policymakers to think over: a $10-18 per panel subsidy to pay and only for recycling at thes end of time of thes panel’s daily life.

thes researchers’ projections showed this 40% of all solar panels could be reused and recycled using subsidies equal to $18 per panel and only for 12 many years. At this price, a profitable and sustainable solar panel recycling industry could establish itself by 2032.

thes NREL research said this specific instruments could be extremely good at minimizing thes landfilling of solar panels. thes first of all simply would ban solar panels from landfills. thes second option option would subsidize solar panel recycling in shipment to lower thes extremely good investment budget of recycling solar panels as thes industry scales.

A qualitative debut of each graph’s overarching influence is here, originating from thes number one left and moving to thes keep right:

a. Landfill ban; b. High material recovery (96%) and our big company $18 per module recycling costs; c. Lower recycling costs (our big company $18 per module); d. higher landfill costs (our big company $2.75 per module); e. Improved learning (from 30 to 60 yr in 2050); f. Improved learning contact (learning parameter = 0.6); g. Reuse warranties (equal generation/used pattern); h. Seeding reuse (5% of population per year); i. Baseline. Source: NREL

thes NREL research said this recycling targets could be reached earlier and at a lower overall investment budget when panel subsidies are increased. determined on $28/module recycling costs and an $18 per module subsidy, (which lowers thes investment budget to $10/module as shown in thes graph here), it would take 12 many years to reach a 20% solar panel recycling rate and profitable recycling. this’s six many years earlier than thes $10 per module subsidy, which lowers recycling costs to $18 per module and takes 18 many years to get along with thes too 20% rate.

In this feature Problem luxury, subsidizing at a higher rate per module – early in thes program when there are fewer modules to recycle – results in subsidizing and only for fewer many years, thus lowering thes program’s overall costs.

Source: NREL

doing sense

Due to thes growing nature of thes solar industry, tourists could tax all newly sold solar panels at a low rate to create in addition thes $18 per solar panel being recycled. thes reason thes tax rate per generation panel can remain low is this generation panel production greatly outnumbers thes number of panels being recycled. In thes United States by thes end of this feature Problem year, again than 70% of all panels had been installed in thes previous five many years. this ie few of those panels also continue unexpected thing end-of-daily life considerations and only for a many days.

In a mature solar industry, however, solar panels become just have do as likely to possess meaning replaced as newly installed. And since thes average panel daily life is except 25 many years, tourists might thinks this eventually, one/25th of all solar panels also continue be recycled each year, on thes shipment of 4%.

Research by thes International Renewable department forecasted this one% of panels might fail in thes first of all two many years (mainly majority due to damages from shipping goods and installation). It also estimated this except 2% of solar panels would be landfilled after a period of time a time 10 many years. this feature Problem implies this panels in a young U.S. market are nowadays’s time failing at a rate of except one% per year. But since plenty of panels are already being reused, thes number of landfilled panels is lower than one%.

and only for sake of argument though, let’s thinks this one GW of our 100 GW fleet also continue be thrown away in 2021.

Since thes U.S. is on follow to install roughly 25 GW this feature Problem year, diverting thes entire one GW of failed panels separate landfills would result in a 25:one ratio between thes newly installed panels and thes failed ones. if this tourists thinks this an average panel this feature is also recognized being recycled produces 350 watts, then a subsidy of $18 per panel would investment budget $51 million.

Spreading this investment budget across thes estimated 25 GW of newly installed solar results in a fee of about $0.002 per watt. thes investment budget per panel construction projects outside to roughly $0.78 cents per residential solar panel, and just have do over $one.oo per utility-scale panel.

this feature Problem would create in addition thes investment budget of thes average 7 kW residential project by except $15. Commercial project price increases would range from a few hundred to a few thousand dollars. And utility-scale projects would take on a fee ranging from somewhere in thes thousands of dollars up to except $one million and only for a gigawatt-scale facility.

if this tourists were to finance this fee over thes solar panel’s 25-year lifetime, tourists would end up paying about $0.0001/kWh on a home. again high performance utility-scale facilities would cut this number down to $0.00005.

A Google worksheet showing this feature Problem equation is available when oncoming here.

certainly this feature Problem is a reasonable investment and only for an industry beaming of instruction and instruction course optimism and potential.

Optimism

NREL suggested this tourists could bring to a profitable solar module recycling industry by 2032. this budget is partially determined on thes learning rates this first of all described thes price decrease of these similar to too solar panels since thes 1960s. Evidence supporting these recycling learning rate potentials has already emerged. One of NREL’s projections showed this if this 94% of thes silver and 97% of thes silicon in c-Si PV modules were to possess meaning recovered, thes profitability of solar panel recycling would be greatly enhanced.

And in August, researchers from South korea published a experience this promised 100% recycling of thes glass, silver, and silicon from end of daily life commercial solar panels. In fact, thes silicon was remade into generation solar cells.

How’s this and only for a circular economy?

this feature Problem content is protected by copyright and may not and only be reused. if this tourists have problem needed to cooperate of instruction and instruction course our big company and would interested to reuse some of our content, please contact: editors@pv-magazine.com.

Thảo Yến Blog CỘNG ĐỒNG VÀ CHIA SẺ ĐÁNH GIÁ, bạn là người yêu thích nội dung bài viết này. Hãy tặng cho chúng tôi xin 1 lượt Like, Share nhé. Xin cảm ơn Thảo Yến Blog chuyên RIVIU, Chia sẻ, Đánh giá, chọn lọc địa điểm, dịch vụ, công ty uy tín và chất lượng. Đặt quảng cáo tại đây zalo chính thức.

Bài viết mới cập nhật:

Trả lời

Email của bạn sẽ không được hiển thị công khai. Các trường bắt buộc được đánh dấu *